Grievance dressed as law, history warped into license, today’s Court is not checking Trump’s authoritarianism—it’s codifying ...

As she seeks to dismiss her case, Judge Hannah Dugan's lawyers assert the Supreme Court's 2024 Trump v. U.S. decision suggested that judicial immunity is broad.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that former President Donald Trump had immunity while in office. However, this immunity applies only to official decisions, according to Reuters.

The provision would bar courts from enforcing contempt citations for violations of injunctions or temporary restraining ...

The Supreme Court's slow handling of the case and its decision to return key questions about the scope of Trump's immunity to the ... the president of the United States," added Biden, speaking ...

The ruling makes a distinction between official actions of a president, which have immunity ... even including the Supreme Court of the United States,” he said, urging voters to prevent his ...

The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided United States v. Miller, which resolved a circuit split over whether a trustee could ...

In rejecting the “moment of threat” defense, the court opens the door to greater officer accountability — though how the ruling will shape policing on the ground is still uncertain.

But “most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts,” it said. As evidence, the motion cited the 2024 Supreme Court ...

While there is no serious argument that Trump’s birthright citizenship order is legal, there are very serious arguments on ...

Over dissents from two liberal justices, the U.S. Supreme Court said Maine's state legislature must restore voting powers to ...

Dugan faces federal charges of obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest, stemming from an April incident.